Li Dai, Ph.D.

Professor of Management, College of Business Administration

  • Los Angeles CA UNITED STATES

Contact

Media

Biography

You can contact Li Dai at Li.Dai@lmu.edu.

Li Dai teaches undergraduate and MBA courses in international business, strategic management and global strategy at LMU. In addition, Dai has taught extensively in the business programs at Texas A&M University and Ivey Business School, with the latter's MBA program ranked #1 in the world by Bloomberg Businessweek. Her studies utilizing geo-referencing methodology on firm strategy in hostile contexts are considered seminal by peers in the field of management. This research, along with her work on institutions in emerging markets, has been recognized with prestigious awards and invited for publication by Oxford University Press and featured in the highest-ranked journals in fields spanning international business, strategic management and entrepreneurship. She is a faculty fellow at the Center for Emerging Markets at Northeastern University and sits on the Editorial Review Board of the Journal of International Business Studies and Journal of International Business Policy, both top-ranked journals in the field of international business and the two flagship journals of the Academy of International Business.

Education

Texas A&M University

Ph.D.

Strategic Management and International Business

2011

University of Toronto

B.Com.

Finance and Economics

2006

Social

Areas of Expertise

Political Violence
Emerging Markets
Multinational Corporations
Institutional Theory
Firm Strategy in Hostile Contexts
Geographical Information Systems (GIS)

Industry Expertise

Education/Learning
Political Organization
Management Consulting

Accomplishments

LMU EMBA Business Applications of Blockchain Certificate

2019

eFaculty Certificate for Online and Hybrid Teaching and Learning

2019

Strategic Management Society Best Paper Prize Finalist

2017

Show All +

Affiliations

  • Academy of Management
  • Strategic Management Society
  • Academy of International Business

Articles

Propagating a permanent war economy? U.S. FDI in warring host countries

Multinational Business Review

2024-01-10

Conventional wisdom suggests that war in the host country makes it unattractive for foreign firms to invest. To see if this is true for US firms on the aggregate, this paper aims to examine the veracity of a “permanent war economy” hypothesis, that foreign direct investment (FDI) may, in fact, increase in the host country not despite, but because of, war, i.e. one that lends credence to the idea that, in the USA, “defense [has] become one of constant preparation for future wars and foreign interventions rather than an exercise in response to one-off threats.”

View more

Anticipation and foreign exit from conflict zones: A vulnerability framework

Strategy in a Turbulent Era

2024-01-09

This chapter advances theory to explain how differences in firms’ ability to anticipate the outbreak of a violent conflict affect their foreign exit decisions. Drawing on the literature on firm vulnerability to exogenous shocks, the chapter explores how differences in anticipation affect whether a firm exits the host country, and if so, the timing (early/late) and mode (partial/whole) of its exit. Our propositions are derived from a microeconomic model where the firm is assumed to be a rational actor engaging in decision-making under uncertainty, in which the exit strategy depends on the trade-off between the costs of exit and staying in response to an exogenous political shock. In this model, we explore the implications of bounded rationality together with optimistic and pessimistic biases on the firm’s decision-making. We find that anticipation of a violent conflict is positively associated with exit from the host country and that exit is more likely to be early and partial.

View more

The timing and mode of foreign exit from conflict zones: A behavioral perspective

Journal of International Business Studies

2022-12-07

We examine the timing and mode of firm exits from host-country conflict zones. We argue that timing and mode are interdependent decisions where decision ordering matters, and show that a firm’s prioritizing of either exit timing or mode is dependent on the relative salience of two behavioral stimuli: (1) the firm’s own experience (i.e., its performance shortfall), and (2) the experience of peer firms (i.e., their exits). Using instrumental variables modeling on a sample of 101 Japanese MNE exits from 11 conflict-afflicted countries between 1991 and 2005, we demonstrate that, when mode is prioritized over timing, partial exits tend to occur earlier and whole exits later. However, when timing is prioritized over mode, the decision choices reverse: earlier exits tend to be whole and later exits partial. The outcome of one decision therefore affects that of the other in a unique and predictable manner, such that the ordering of the decisions both produces and precludes strategic choices. Our findings, based on a multidecision problem that has traditionally been treated as a single decision (i.e., foreign exit), delineate expanded boundary conditions for satisficing, as well as reconcile optimizing and satisficing behaviors.

View more

Show All +
Powered by